WHEREAS, many technical violations of probation or community control do not involve new arrests or other serious violations, and
WHEREAS, arresting and incarcerating certain non-violent offenders for minor violations of probation or community control is expensive and often unproductive, and
WHEREAS, holding offenders accountable by applying swift and certain sanctions for technical violations of probation or community control can reduce recidivism is supported by research, and
WHEREAS, potential benefits of administratively processing certain technical violations include:
NOW THEREFORE, I, RAUL A. ZAMBRANO, Chief Judge of the Seventh Judicial Circuit of Florida, hereby order that the following provisions apply to the Felony Alternative V.O.P. Sanctions program in the Seventh Judicial Circuit.
1. ELIGIBILITY. In order to be eligible for the program, offenders must have been placed on probation or community control under the supervision of the Department of Corrections by a judge in Flagler, Putnam, St. Johns, or Volusia counties; have stable community ties; and have a stable residence in the county where sentenced. Offenders who are eligible for the program include probation offenders (including drug offenders) and community control supervision offenders. The program applies only to offenders who have committed certain technical violations addressed in the Alternative Sanctions Program Violation/Sanction Matrix included in this order. The threat an offender poses to public safety is an important factor in determining eligibility. Offenders with lengthy or violent criminal backgrounds (including sex offenders) are not eligible for the program. Additionally, offenders who are charged with new law violations, have absconded, or have violated a “no contact” condition of supervision are not eligible for the program. Offenders with three or more previous violations are not eligible for the program.
2. QUALIFYING TECHNICAL VIOLATIONS AND APPROVED SANCTIONS. The following matrix lists the specific technical violations that may be addressed through the Alternative Sanctions process for offenders who were sentenced in Flagler, Putnam, St. Johns, or Volusia counties. Each technical violation includes a list of sanctions determined and approved by the court for the probation officer to select from when reporting these technical violations, based on an individual offender’s circumstances at the time of the violation.
ALTERNATIVE SANCTIONS PROGRAM VIOLATION/SANCTION MATRIX
LOW RISK VIOLATIONS:
|
APPROVED LIST OF SANCTIONS FOR FIRST OR SECOND LOW-RISK VIOLATIONS: |
---|---|
|
|
MODERATE-RISK VIOLATIONS:
|
APPROVED LIST OF SANCTIONS FOR FIRST MODERATE-RISK VIOLATION:
|
|
|
3. ALTERNATIVE SANCTIONS PROGRAM PROCESS
A. The probation or community control officer shall inform offenders who have committed violations enumerated above that they may participate in the Alternative Sanctions Program for administrative disposition of the violation. No offender is required to participate in the Alternative Sanctions Program and may opt for a formal violation of probation or community control proceeding.
B. If the offender admits the violation, agrees to accept the administrative sanction(s) recommended by the probation officer, and agrees to waive a formal violation hearing to modify his/her sentence, the probation officer will prepare an “Alternative Sanctions Program Technical Violation Notification”, which will provide details of the circumstances of the technical violation that occurred and the probation officer’s recommended sanction, based on the sanctions listed in the approved matrix. If the offender agrees to participate in the Alternative Sanctions Program, he/she will sign the second section of the form entitled “Alternative Sanctions Program Waiver of Formal VOP/VOCC Hearing, Admission of Violation, and Acceptance of Sanctions,” which will be submitted to the court once the probation officer signs and dates the form.
C. The “Alternative Sanctions Program Technical Violation Notification” and waiver form will be submitted to a judge for review. If the judge agrees that the technical violation should be addressed via the Alternative Sanctions Program and agrees with the recommended sanction, he/she will sign an “Order – Alternative Sanctions Program.” If the judge does not agree with the particular sanction recommended by the officer or does not agree that the technical violation should be addressed via the Alternative Sanctions Program, he/she will provide further direction.
D. Upon court approval, the probation officer will instruct the offender on the sanction imposed by the court and instruct the offender to take actions necessary to ensure the sanction is fulfilled promptly. Failure to complete the imposed sanction as instructed will result in a violation report, affidavit and warrant being submitted to the court.
E. Participation in the Alternative Sanctions Program is not considered a conviction for a violation of probation or community control (not a scoreable violation) for purposes of Section VI of the Criminal Punishment Code Scoresheet.
TO BE RECORDED in Flagler, Putnam, St. Johns and Volusia counties.
DONE AND ORDERED in Daytona Beach, Volusia County, Florida this 22nd day of January 2020.
Under Florida law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact the Court by phone or in writing.
Disclaimer
The Seventh Judicial Circuit provides the information on this website as a service to the public. While some of the information on this site may deal with legal issues, none of such information constitutes legal advice. The Seventh Judicial Circuit does not warrant or guarantee the accuracy or availability of the content on this or on other sites to which we link. In no event will the Seventh Judicial Circuit be held liable to any party for any damages arising in any way out of the availability, use, reliance on or inability to use this website or any information provided by or through the Seventh Judicial Circuit website, or for any claim attributable to errors, omissions or other inaccuracies in the Seventh Judicial Circuit website.